Christian Schneider

Author, Columnist

Author: Christian (page 39 of 81)

A Much-Needed Breakthrough

This year seems to be the year where underrepresented groups break through in politics. We could have the first woman or African-American as president, which would represent a huge leap for gender or race status in government. Yet there\’s one group that is still woefully underrepresented in electoral politics – hot people.

As the old saying goes, \”politics is Hollywood for ugly people.\” People who may not necessarily deserve recognition for their looks can force their own celebrity by running for office. This theory shakes out nicely when one looks at the Wisconsin Legislature, which often looks like the Creature Cantina from Star Wars. (\”Senator Greedo, you have the floor.\”)

\"\"This weekend at the Defending the Dream Summit, I happened to meet Jill Didier, who is running for Mayor of Wauwatosa. Incumbent Mayor Theresa Estness has decided not to run again – presumably to spend more time hugging Michael McGee. I think it is fair to say, without reservation, that Didier would be an anomaly in the world of political looks. (Like how I said that diplomatically?)

I have no idea what a single one of her positions on the issues is, but she\’d have my vote if I lived in Tosa. She could be for mandating lawn elves in every Wauwatosa yard, and I\’d still vote for her, in the interest of having a smoking hot mayor. She\’d be like the exact opposite of Adrien Brody (an ugly actor breaking into the world of beautiful people).

So, people of Wauwatosa, this is your chance to help out a much-neglected political minority. Once this domino drops, it might provoke more hot people to come out of the closet and run for office – suddenly, the local news will become watchable.

Until then, though, Wisconsin is stuck with dreamboat beefcake State Senator Ted Kanavas as its sole political eye candy:

\"\"
(Photo taken in 1983)

(Footnote: This post may make things uncomfortable if I ever run into Didier again, but it\’s not likely, so I\’m not worried. I\’m merely reporting the facts. Plus, she should be so thankful, she should make me the Tosa Secretary of Lawn Elf Administration.)

Defending the Dream Summary

My post rounding up my experience at the Defending the Dream conference this weekend is up at the WPRI blog.

It was snowing in Milwaukee after the conference, so I stayed with my friend Johnny Roast Beef, rather than driving back to Madison. The night ended up at Jo-Cat\’s bar on Brady Street, which made for a long Sunday. And I am willing to declare that the Apollo Cafe on Brady Street has the best gyros in Milwaukee. Hands down.

Major Breaking Wisconsin Primary News

My four-year old daughter has officially changed her endorsement from Barack Obama to Hillary Clinton, she announced yesterday. This is sending shock waves through the Wisconsin political landscape. Hillary should quickly declare my daughter a super-delegate.

On the other hand, I\’m close to getting my two-year old son to switch over to the John McCain side – although he dislikes the McCain-Feingold law as much as his dad. However, he\’s impressed by the fact that they both wear diapers.

Defending the American Dream Wrap Up

On Saturday, I attended the \”Defending the American Dream\” Summit at the Country Springs Hotel in Waukesha. The event was put on by the Americans for Prosperity-Wisconsin chapter, and featured speakers such as Dinesh D\’Souza, Steve Moore, David Clarke, Paul Ryan, Jim Sensenbrenner, and others.

The event started at 10:00, so I rolled in at 9:30 to get registered. I actually got a press pass – the only benefit for which apparently was that it meant I didn\’t have to pay the $29 enrollment fee. I was the only one I saw at the whole conference that had a press pass that said \”Media\” on it. When I saw Patrick McIlheran from the Journal-Sentinel, I showed him my pass and said \”so who\’s the big shot now, Mr. Journal Sentinel?\”

I realized the event was being televised by my arch-nemesis WisconsinEye, and wondered how many people would be sitting at home watching it on TV. Then again, if I showed up on any of the coverage, WisconsinEye would just edit me out.

The program started with a couple montages of Ronald Reagan, to get the crowd fired up. I\’m actually of two minds about exhuming the Reagan legacy. Naturally, he stands for the principles conservatives care about the most, and he enjoyed one of the greatest presidencies of the 20th century. All of that is worth honoring, and it makes sense for today\’s candidates to try to get a little slice of the Reagan pie. But as a famous basketball coach once said, \”Ronald Reagan ain\’t walking through that door.\” It\’s just too hard of a standard to live up to, which is going to make virtually any Republican candidate look like he or she falls short. It would be like the Bucks telling the fans they want to add a player to the team with all the qualities of Michael Jordan, then signing Bobby Simmons to an $80 million contract. Wait, that actually happened?

After introductions by Tim Phillips and Mark Block, Wisconsin Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen got things started with a good speech with some red meat for the crowd. I thought he did a good job deflecting some of the criticism conservatives have had about his tenure – that he hasn\’t been active enough in promoting a conservative agenda. Basically, he said he ran as someone who wasn\’t going to inject his own personal beliefs into the law, and that he\’s carrying through on his word. If someone wants to change the law, they will have to do so by actually changing the law, not through activism on the part of the Attorney General, as Democrats have done for decades. I think that was a message that the crowd appreciated.

Other speakers came and went, all with good messages for the true believers in the crowd. Steve Moore from the Wall Street Journal gave a hand-waving, manic speech reminiscent of a Richard Lewis stand-up routine. Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke gave a pretty low-key speech. I\’ve seen him give talks to smaller crowds where he\’s shown a lot more fire. It was a good speech, but seemed pretty reserved. An excellent accounting of all the morning speakers can be found at Steve Eggleston\’s blog, and at WisconsinEye when they get the archived video up.

Before lunch, Dinesh D\’Souza gave what could be considered the keynote speech, primarily about Ronald Reagan. I admire D\’Souza a great deal, and have read a few of his books – including his book about Reagan. (Although I have to admit, it was a long time ago, and I don\’t remember much about it.) His speech was really good, replete with catchy Reagan one-liners, although it kind of had the feel of a speech that he\’s delivered 100 times. That\’s not a criticism at all – there\’s no speech I could deliver in my sleep, other than maybe a dissertation on how to work my remote control. And his speech was smooth as a gravy sandwich.

Another blogger pointed out this juicy tidbit from D\’Souza\’s Wikipedia entry:

Prior to his marriage in 1992, D\’Souza had relationships with two well-known female conservatives, Laura Ingraham, a nationally-syndicated radio commentator to whom he was engaged but never married, and best-selling conservative author and commentator Ann Coulter.

Wow – in the nerdy conservative world, D\’Souza\’s toting some some pretty heavy lumber. Ingraham and Coulter are the gold standard of right-wing pinup girls, and he had both of them. If he had completed the triumvirate and dated Margaret Thatcher, there\’d be a foundation set up to name bridges after him.

I have to sheepishly admit that during the awards ceremony (awards were given to Congressman Paul Ryan, State Representative Leah Vukmir, and talk show host Vicki McKenna), I snuck out and got a cheeseburger from the Brookfield Kopp\’s. I don\’t get back to Milwaukee very often, and that\’s one thing I have to do on every trip. So I ate my burger in my car, then got out to throw my trash in one of the cans, and missed – which meant I had to trudge through three feet-high snow to retrieve my trash and put it in the trash can. When I turned around, I saw that everyone inside Kopp\’s was watching me and laughing. I bowed, accordingly.

I attended the first afternoon breakout session entitled \”The New Media vs. The Old Media,\” sponsored by the Lucy Burns Institute. Panelists included Leslie Graves of the Lucy Burns Institute, Patrick McIlheran, Jo Egelhoff from Foxpolitics.net, and Kyle Duerstein from PantherTalkLive. They went through a basic explanation of blogs before Patrick got about ten straight questions from people wanting to know why their local newspaper won\’t print their letters to the editor. But it gave some of the older folks in the crowd a little more insight as to what this whole \”interweb\” is all about, so it was a constructive session.

Before the afternoon session, I chatted with Owen Robinson, Fred Dooley, Tom McMahon, and Pete Fanning for a little bit. All really nice guys – but it proved my \”20% theory\” with regard to blogs. That is, any time a blogger posts a picture of themselves on their profile, they are always 20% thinner in the photo than they are in real life. Myself included. Sadly,Tom is having difficulty finding a hat like the one he\’s wearing in his photo – if anyone can help him find one, it would be much appreciated.

I then caught Wisconsin Taxpayer Alliance President Todd Berry\’s talk about Wisconsin\’s budgeting woes. I could listen to Todd talk all day, as he falls into the category of \”people who know a lot about a lot\” (as opposed to people like me, who know very little about a lot of different topics.) He discussed topics near and dear to my heart, like the state\’s growing debt load and the lack of a rainy day fund, and how those phenomena are harming our budgetary standing.

Dinner was accompanied by a speech from Congressman Jim Sensenbrenner, now entering his 83rd year in the House of Representatives. Conservatives pretty much know Sensenbrenner\’s deal by now – he\’s crusty and irascible, but he\’s our guy, so we listen intently. I actually find Sensenbrenner\’s crankiness somewhat endearing. He doesn\’t care what you think, and he\’s going to tell it to you like it is, not like how you want it. When politicians bend over backwards to kiss up to their constituents, you end up with abominations like universal health care. Granted, being in Congress so long allows him some leeway to be blunt with his supporters, but it is refreshing.

Congressman Sensenbrenner actually made some pretty pointed criticisms of John McCain in his speech, which surprised me. During the question-and-answer period, someone asked him what he thought of John McCain as a legislator. \”I JUST TOLD YOU!\” he boomed. He also discussed the Cap and Trade Global Warming plan that is being pushed in Congress (not to be confused with the Cap\’n Crunch plan, which does nothing for global warming, but does contain 18 essential vitamins and minerals.) He actually took questions for quite a while – I thought he was going to go all night, which was pretty nice of him.

After that, I had to rush out and drive around in the snow. A really good conference all-around. I\’m not sure what the plans are for subsequent years, but it should be a must-attend for those interested in furthering the cause of lower taxes and individual freedoms.

During the slow periods, I actually was able to show off my cool new microphone and interview a few of the speakers. Here are the official WPRI exclusive interviews:

Dinesh D\’Souza

State Representative Leah Vukmir

State Senator Ted Kanavas

WTA\’s Todd Berry

(D\’Souza doesn\’t really answer my third question, which is fair enough, since I wasn\’t exactly sure what I was asking.)

Time Saving Tips

I pulled out the old Mr. Show DVDs last night, and was reminded of this outstanding running sketch. I actually had to wait about a half hour to go to bed last night, since I couldn\’t stop laughing, and I didn\’t want to wake my wife up.

There are three minute-long videos that you have to watch in succession, as they build on each other. The last one nearly killed me.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zkMFFm4tdQ&rel=1]

Historically Bad Dressing

I got a new pair of tires today, so I had the chance to wander around the mall as they were being mounted. I figured the fact that they went flat once a week might be a hint something was wrong.

A took a stroll through the Gap, and found one of the more welcome sights I\’ve seen in a long time – they were selling flannel shirts. Apparently, flannel is creeping back into style, which means I will be able to pull out my college wardrobe and be cool once again.

Back in 1997, I started grad school at Marquette. On my first day of classes, I thought I\’d try to immerse myself into college life once again. So I showed up on campus wearing what I thought the kids were wearing those days – big flannel shirts, Doc Martens, the whole deal. I quickly realized that I was the only one on campus that wore that stuff anymore. The early \’90s had come and gone, and I looked like a fool. Instead of a student, I looked like a historical artifact from the grunge era. You could go to a museum and see me on display – right between the statues of the American Indians making corn maize and the skeleton of a pterodactyl.

\”Come see the homo grungus in his natural habitat – see his perpetual look of indifference, coupled with his ironic facial hair and untucked shirts. Watch him as he condemns any music you listen to as too \”corporate,\” and complains incessantly of his middle-class upbringing. Sadly, the homo grungus was extinct by 1994, although one was spotted on the Marquette University campus as late as 1997.\”

So world, here I come – just give me an excuse.

Super Duper Tuesday Roundup

Some observations from the big primaries last night:

1. Endorsements are meaningless. How\’d the Kennedy love-fest work out for Obama in Massachusetts? How much time did the media spend covering how \”Camelot\” had blessed Obama? I\’m waiting for CNN to break into their programming to announce how wrong they were with the same fervor. \”BREAKING NEWS! Remember that Kennedy endorsement? Uhhhh…. never mind.\”

2. Money isn\’t meaningless, but it\’s close to it. Mitt Romney flooded the southern states and California with campaign ads and finished third in a great deal of them.

3. Rush Limbaugh\’s name was invoked dozens of times on MSNBC, CNN, and Fox, as if he is somehow the King of Conservative Nation. The election results last night showed that not only is this not the case, the coverage demonstrated that networks are only willing to understand conservatives at the most surface level. As if conservatives are more easily led around by popular entertainers. I\’m anxiously awaiting the news stories about how split the Democratic Party is because George Clooney endorsed Obama.

4. CNN spent the entire night dicing up the electorate to tell us how various ethnicities voted. I waited patiently by the TV for them to call out my group – how did lumpy Catholic white guys vote? Who won the Brazilian amputee vote?

5. Bill Richardson showed up on TV sporting a horrific beard. It looks like after he dropped out of the Democratic primaries, he\’s been sleeping under some high school football bleachers in Las Cruces, clutching a bottle of Wild Irish Rose in a paper bag.

6. For a long time, I\’ve taken offense to the media\’s portrayal of Evangelicals as single-issue, myopic voters. After Huckabee\’s big victories in the south, I think I may be less right than I thought.

7. Several TV commentators mentioned that McCain might want to consider Jeb Bush as a running mate. This is actually a great idea, if John McCain plans on spending next January golfing.

8. As far as vice presidential candidates for McCain, I still think Charlie Crist is the leader in the clubhouse.

9. Hispanics really don\’t like Obama. Formulate your own hypothesis as to why – but it\’s undeniable. That spells bad news for Obama in Texas, which he really needs to win to make up some ground.

10. Obama tended to win the states that traditionally vote Republican in the general election (Idaho, Utah, Colorado, Georgia, Alabama). I don\’t think this is a small point. In states with a weak, or nonexistent, Democratic party, Obama did well. In states with an entrenched Democratic bureaucracy, Hillary wins. This suggests that Clinton fares better among the more hard core activists.

11. On Monday night, John Kerry spoke at an Obama rally. He said that under President Obama, there would be no more Abu Ghraib. Listening to Kerry pronounce \”Abu Ghraib\” gave the listener a glimpse at what it might actually be like to be in Abu Ghraib. He mangled it, as if he had only ever seen the word in print. Wonder if he\’s ever gotten around to learning how to say \”Genghis Khan.\”

Also, it appears that one of Obama\’s big talking points is that he will \”close Guantanamo.\” I\’m not in the business of offering political advice, but I would suggest that Obama drops this as a talking point. There are terrorists in Guantanamo – and if they\’re not there, they\’re going to be somewhere else. Like living in the U.S. People understand that.

12. I watched Mike Huckabee shuffle from network to network to network doing interviews. And in each interview, he had a fresh observation or one-liner. I don\’t recall him repeating any of his points. Just a fantastic speaker.

13. I hadn\’t watched Chris Matthews probably since the 2004 elections (I never watch Hardball or the O\’Reilly Factor or any of those goofy shows). Now I remember why. I felt like I needed to keep a towel handy with him spitting at me so much.

The Fame Game

Has anyone else noticed that former Badger Joe Thomas made the Pro Bowl? As a rookie? I always theorized that the Cleveland Browns\’ surprising season was due in large part to Thomas\’ blocking, and it turns out other people may have noticed that, too. Then again, I\’m a homer, so it\’s hard to tell.

Last spring, after he was drafted, my friends and I went to a bar here in Madison. Late that night, I actually ended up sitting on bench right next to Thomas. As it turns out, he went to the same high school as my wife. During his career here, I always figured that if I ever met him, that would be my opening line. But sitting a foot away from his 6 foot 8 frame, that conversation starter seemed like pretty weak sauce. So I just kept quiet. (Incidentally, he seemed like a great guy.)

You see, I have this thing about meeting famous people. I generally try to think of what my opening line will be well in advance of actually meeting them, even if no such meeting is planned. So I have something in my back pocket just in case I run into, say, Barry Alvarez at the grocery store. (I realize how irrational this is, given the fact that most famous people don\’t hang out near my couch, where I spend most of my time.)

Not adhering to this practice almost got me in trouble a few months ago. I was heading down to the Wisconsin Public TV studios to tape my little commentary, when I got news that Tammy Baldwin was on the show. So I thought there was a chance she\’d be there at the studio. Then I realized that I have no line for Tammy Baldwin. The \”Baldwin File\” in my brain was empty. So I panicked, thinking we\’d meet, and I\’d just stand there like a dope. (Fortunately, she did her interview via feed from DC, so embarrassment saved. Although I still need a good one – suggestions are welcome.)

This got me to thinking about which people would be immune to opening lines. The people who you\’d be so nervous meeting, you couldn\’t spit out a word. Then you\’d feel stupid, and it would wreck your life for all eternity. Here\’s my (admittedly, eclectic) list:

1. George Will

2. Michael Jordan

3. Michael Stipe

4. Tom Wolfe

5. Brett Favre

I asked some friends for their lists of people they\’d be nervous meeting. I got answers like Paul McCartney, Charles Manson, Jessica Alba, George Bush, Pope Benedict, and James Hetfield of Metallica. (Five bucks for anyone who can get all those people together in a hot tub.) Two of my friends separately said they\’d be nervous meeting Bill Parcells, since they thought he\’d yell at them. A female friend said her list was Osama bin Laden, Brad Pitt, and George Clooney – which means if bin Laden shows up in \”Ocean\’s Fourteen,\” she might have a stroke.

Weekend Movie Roundup

Having seen pretty much all the decent movies out right now, the Mrs. and I decided to go see \”Atonement\” on Friday night. This is a weird year, as I have now seen four of the five Best Picture Oscar nominees (Michael Clayton being the only one I haven\’t seen.)

So here\’s the official review: It was looooooooong. I fully expected my first Medicare check to be in the mail when I got home. The ending was decent, but it took forever to get there. Two hours of British costume drama is too much for me, although you can do a lot worse than Keira Knightley (pretty much the whole reason I agreed to go in the first place.)

Saturday night, I watched a movie called \”Rocket Science,\” and thought it was outstanding. There was an element of \”Rushmore\” (which happens to be my favorite movie) and other high school flicks, but it quickly came into its own. (It also steals Alec Baldwin as the narrator, which is stolen directly from Wes Anderson\’s \”The Royal Tenenbaums.\”) I thought it perfectly captured the feeling of changing who you are to attract a girlfriend in high school.

Here\’s the trailer:

I checked the reviews of \”Rocket Science\” at RottenTomatoes.com, and it gets an 85% favorability rating. But then I noticed how much money it had made – a pitiful $601,000 since it was released in August.

That is part of my frustration with movies like \”Meet the Spartans,\” which has now made $28 million in two weekends. A smart, well executed movie like \”Rocket Science\” can\’t draw any viewers, but bottom feeding dreck rolls in the cash. As the saying goes, no one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public.

Roadkill on the Information Highway

Some of you may remember when I \”came out\” of my anonymous persona last February. I chose to do it in a Melanie Conklin interview in the Wisconsin State Journal. She seemed to be under the impression that I was somehow worth interviewing, so I happily agreed.

Fast forward to yesterday, when I got a flurry of e-mails from people pointing out that Melanie\’s latest \”Drinks With….\” column features another blogger (Ryan Zeinert) here in Madison. They gleefully highlighted the fact that Melanie has found a \”new flavor of the week,\” and that I am now \”old news.\”

So it is true, my carcass had now been cast aside. The empty shell of a once-interesting blogger, replaced by a newer model. I always knew Melanie would leave me for a younger man, but it doesn\’t blunt the sting much. I feel like an aging stripper, clinging to the pole for one last teary rendition of \”Kickstart my Heart,\” while men turn away in horror. Or something like that.

Anyway, I wish Ryan Zeinert the best of luck on his newfound fame and the untold riches that are likely to follow. I just hope he thinks about us trailblazers when I\’m begging him for loose change down on State Street.

Who is Looking Out for the Stupid?

I often see ads for movies that there\’s no chance I\’d go see, but rarely have I had as visceral reaction as I did when I saw the commercial for \”Meet the Spartans.\” It looked like the most offensive, bottom-feeding dreck I\’d ever seen. Making fun of gay spartans? Genius. Throwing a Britney Spears look-alike down a hole? Comedy gold!

Here\’s a commercial. Prepare yourself to be the opposite of entertained:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7kHtkxTcuQ&rel=1]

As it turns out, the movie is the epic piece of trash it appears.

But lo and behold, guess what the #1 movie of the weekend was? That\’s right – \”Meet the Spartans\” checked in at $18 million, slightly ahead of the similarly cerebral \”Rambo.\” I think it\’s safe to say that if you had $8.00 and chose to spend it on \”Meet the Spartans\” over \”Juno,\” \”There Will Be Blood,\” or \”No Country for Old Men,\” you should be eligible for a government-subsidized lobotomy.

So obviously, stupid people are drawn to this movie like moths to a flame. And the studio is more than willing to take their money. So my question is this: Who is looking out for the morons?

The nation\’s economy is about to go in the tank because of the housing crisis – mostly caused by people who were unaware of the terms of their mortgages. Apparently they were absent in math class the day math was taught. In any event, banks are being vilified for \”preying\” on these simpletons – for offering them the chance to own a home, which they couldn\’t do under the terms of a standard mortgage.

I see no difference between that situation and \”Meet the Spartans.\” Hollywood throws out nauseating garbage like meat to the wolves and rips stupid people off. Americans (mostly young, I would hope) spent $18 million to see this trash, when they could have been saving up for college. Actually, scratch that – I can\’t say that with a straight face. The kids seeing this movie aren\’t setting foot near a college campus.

I just hope everyone has the same animus toward movie studios as they do mortgage bankers, for stealing money from these people. There are no good guys in this story.

This post also gives me the chance to display this, which is kind of funny:

\"\"

Breske Tells Big Government to “Butt Out”

In order to run a house of the state legislature, party discipline is a must. Certain members of your caucus aren’t going to agree with leadership on everything, but a lot of them will go along for the ride to achieve a greater goal.

In the Wisconsin State Senate, Democratic leadership is pushing for a smoking ban in virtually every business in the state. They cite the ban as a health issue, and have the backing of groups like Smoke Free Wisconsin and the American Cancer Society.

Until this point, Democratic Senator Roger Breske has been playing good soldier and working on a compromise bill for his caucus. Breske represents a district full of local taverns that just want government to leave them alone and make their own choices about what’s best for their businesses. As a result, Senator Breske is skeptical of the long arm of government reaching up into the north woods to micromanage the property rights of his constituents.

This week, Senate Democrats held a press conference to announce their economic “stimulus” package. During the question and answer period, Breske was asked about the smoking ban. He stammered a little, describing the process up to this point, and the fact that no agreement had been reached. Senate Majority Decker stepped in immediately to reiterate the caucus position that a smoking ban is needed.

Breske was then asked a follow-up question, at which point he dropped the “consensus builder” charade and told it like it is. He pointed out the fact that these taverns are often all the owners have in terms of investments, and a smoking ban could shut them down (a point Decker conceded in his comments.) He then bemoaned government “sticking its nose” in everyone’s business, saying, “why does the government have to tell everyone what to do all the time?”

At this point, the Senate Democrats behind him begin shifting nervously, their eyes darting around the room. Senator John Lehman cracked a smile.

Breske went on: “I just can’t believe this is what we’re here for. We should be doing something decent… instead of trying to put people out of business. I know that they say this is the greatest thing in the world, that it’s going to solve all the health problems in the country, but that’s hogwash. I was born and raised in a barn since I was that high, and I was tending bar since I was that high (holding hand four feet above the ground.) And there was only one light bulb in the bar. There was no fans, and everyone smoked. It was blue in there. Come on, I’m still alive, and I’m 69 years old. It’s sickening.

(If you’re keeping score that would be Breske 1, science 0.)

Needless to say, Breske’s remarks are likely not going to make their way into the Democrats’ talking points when they eventually pass a smoking ban. While the media love nothing more than covering Republicans that criticize other Republicans, here’s an independent Democrat who deserves credit for exposing the wrongheadedness of a statewide smoking ban. Kudos to him.

Video of the press conference can be seen at the WisconsinEye website here. Breske begins at the 17:30 mark, but begins his breathtaking tirade at 20:00.

Cutting Down Religion

It appears the Catholic Archdiocese of Milwaukee is a little strapped for cash these days, so they have to cut $3 million from their budget.

I have to say, this is a little spiritually unsettling. You don’t normally think of religions as having to deal with the normal constraints of modern day life – after all, God created the world – you’d think the bank might cut him a little slack. (Or God could try the old \”mail the phone bill to the gas company and vice versa\” trick that worked so well in college.) So it\’s hard to think of something so sacred and powerful having to deal with real people problems. It\’s like recognizing that Natalie Portman occasionally has to poop. Anyway.

Seeing as how the Church is in charge of my post-life accommodations, I thought I\’d pitch in and offer a few cost-saving techniques to help them out:

1. Eternal salvation now accompanied by $20 processing fee;

2. Number of times you’re allowed to take the Lord’s name in vain capped to rate of inflation;

3. Partial insertion no longer a mortal sin;

4. Confession now accompanied by two-drink minimum requirement;

5. Smaller rosaries, quicker penance;

6. Archbishop hat size reduced by 30%;

7. Fire in; brimstone out;

8. Guilt-free Thursdays;

9. Members of the same sex can marry, as long as they’re not gay;

10. Communion now features Thunderbird fortified wine;

11. Baptize three kids at once, get the fourth free;

12. God orders sub-prime mortgage loan on the Vatican forgiven;

13. 15% tax on bad comedian jokes about growing up in Catholic household;

14. Catholic schoolgirl uniform must be returned by strippers after third use;

15. Basilica renamed the \”Hooters\’ Christ Hut;\”

16. Details of Vatican scheme to control the world\’s money supply sold to the Weekly World News for $100;

17. Coveting neighbor\’s wife legal with the purchase of any two Pope Benedict pilates videos.

That\’s it. That\’s the list.

As a \”thank you,\” the Church may now begin paying me my long-overdue Altar Boy pension. I spent years ringing those damn bells, it\’s payback time.

UPDATE: As it turns out, this post belongs in the \”Bad Timing Hall of Fame,\” given today\’s revelations about past priest behavior in Milwaukee. Nothing funny about any of the documents released.

Is Medicare Harming Seniors?

Interesting article this week in The Economist, where they point out that increased Medicare funding, in the form of President Bush\’s Medicare Part D program, might actually be harming seniors in the program.

While they concede that the program has been able to get seniors lower costs on prescription drugs, it has also faced damaging cost overruns that threaten to cut into other areas of Medicare spending.  Specifically, if the prescription drug plan continues to grow, reimbursement to doctors for treating elderly Medicare recipients may be cut.  As a result, many doctors would simply refuse to treat Medicare patients.  Others would treat them, but pass the costs on to non-Medicare patients to make up for the reduced payments.

The article concludes:

Doctors and hospitals already had a disincentive to take on Medicare patients, as cost-cutting laws enacted by Congress years ago were anyway hurting their margins. But in late December, Congress went further, and very nearly enacted a mandatory 10% cut in doctors\’ reimbursements for Medicare patients. In the end, doctors got a six-month reprieve; efforts are now under way in the Senate to extend that reprieve for a further two years. If such cuts go through, most doctors will think again about treating Medicare patients.

Mr Bush\’s Medicare reforms are popular today, but a backlash may be coming. Some private firms have been caught manipulating the elderly into signing up for inappropriate plans. Questions are being asked about why the public is subsidising the marketing expenses of pharmaceutical companies\’ expenses that the public sector does not incur. Those doubts will turn into howls if Part D puts the rest of Medicare under the scalpel.

Adrien Brody is Causing the Recession

I know, I know – we\’re not in a recession yet. But I have pinpointed the reason why the economy might be slowing down. I lay the blame squarely on the shoulders of actor Adrien Brody.

\"\"You may have seen Brody in his various movies, including his Oscar winning role in \”The Pianist.\” He can most recently be seen in the snoozefest \”The Darjeeling Limited.\” (Random fact: Brody is 13 days older than I am.)

There\’s no easy way to put this, so I\’ll be direct. Adrien Brody doesn\’t have what you would consider \”typical\” leading man looks. In fact, it was a mistake casting him in \”King Kong,\” since his nose made the monkey look small by comparison. He\’s gaunt and greasy, yet for some reason women find him alluring. (Apparently, he was #21 on VH1\’s \”100 Hottest Hotties.\”)

For ugly white guys, Brody\’s presence in movies is a breakthrough. He\’s like the Jackie Robinson of the ugly. If they ever made a live action film about Heckyll and Jeckyll, he wouldn\’t need any makeup. But the guy triggers more ovulation cycles than Clomid.

But this has the chance to cause all kinds of problems with the economy. Suppose us ugly guys get all cocky about Brody\’s success. Suddenly, we all think we have movie star looks – fat guys, bald guys, short guys. All of a sudden we\’ll lose all motivation to do the things that we do to overcompensate for those shortcomings. We\’ll stop buying expensive cars to distract women from our baldness. We won\’t work as hard to accumulate wealth in order to coerce the ladies into thinking we\’re worthwhile. The price of beard hair coloring dye will reach $100 a barrel, causing a national crisis in ugliness. We won\’t start new businesses and hire more guys with excessive nose hair looking to make money. The ugly market will implode.

In order to stop this madness, Congress needs to take action immediately and sequester Adrien Brody. Stick him in the undisclosed bunker with Dick Cheney. Furthermore, we need to elect Mitt Romney president, in order to restore the proper level of handsomeness to the White House.
« Older posts Newer posts »