define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/christ65/public_html/wp-config.php:25) in <b>/home/christ65/public_html/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php</b> on line <b>8</b><br />
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Press Begins to Turn	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christianschneiderblog.com/2008/03/19/147/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christianschneiderblog.com/2008/03/19/147/</link>
	<description>Author, Columnist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:38:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Christian Schneider		</title>
		<link>http://www.christianschneiderblog.com/2008/03/19/147/comment-page-1/#comment-398</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christian Schneider]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wpri.org/blog/?p=147#comment-398</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So we&#039;re supposed to be comforted by the fact that our lower courts have more sense than our Supreme Court?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So we&#8217;re supposed to be comforted by the fact that our lower courts have more sense than our Supreme Court?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Not Saying		</title>
		<link>http://www.christianschneiderblog.com/2008/03/19/147/comment-page-1/#comment-397</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Not Saying]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wpri.org/blog/?p=147#comment-397</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Is it important to note that in the plaintiff lost in the Thomas case?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it important to note that in the plaintiff lost in the Thomas case?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Christian Schneider		</title>
		<link>http://www.christianschneiderblog.com/2008/03/19/147/comment-page-1/#comment-399</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christian Schneider]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wpri.org/blog/?p=147#comment-399</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jo,

At this point, I really don&#039;t care whether an article favors one candidate or another.  I do, however, think it is a step in the right direction for media outlets to discuss the things that actually matter when choosing a Supreme Court justice.  If there are facts beneficial to Louis Butler, then so be it. He should be able to tell his side.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jo,</p>
<p>At this point, I really don&#8217;t care whether an article favors one candidate or another.  I do, however, think it is a step in the right direction for media outlets to discuss the things that actually matter when choosing a Supreme Court justice.  If there are facts beneficial to Louis Butler, then so be it. He should be able to tell his side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jo Egelhoff		</title>
		<link>http://www.christianschneiderblog.com/2008/03/19/147/comment-page-1/#comment-400</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jo Egelhoff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wpri.org/blog/?p=147#comment-400</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I included the Butler/Lead Paint AP piece in this  morning&#039;s FoxPolitics News - and was interested to see you opine that the article favored Judge Gableman. The two paragraphs below indicate that the court&#039;s decision  indeed may not have been so injurious to business. To the average reader, they nullified any suggestion of negative policy-making by Justice Butler.
&quot;Nearly three years later, the dire predictions have not come to pass. A jury ruled against Thomas last year. His attorney, Peter Earle, said he is the only lawyer to file a lead paint claim since the ruling.

&quot;And the state had the 10th best legal climate for businesses in 2007, up from 17th in 2005, according to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I included the Butler/Lead Paint AP piece in this  morning&#8217;s FoxPolitics News &#8211; and was interested to see you opine that the article favored Judge Gableman. The two paragraphs below indicate that the court&#8217;s decision  indeed may not have been so injurious to business. To the average reader, they nullified any suggestion of negative policy-making by Justice Butler.<br />
&#8220;Nearly three years later, the dire predictions have not come to pass. A jury ruled against Thomas last year. His attorney, Peter Earle, said he is the only lawyer to file a lead paint claim since the ruling.</p>
<p>&#8220;And the state had the 10th best legal climate for businesses in 2007, up from 17th in 2005, according to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>